Introduction
The Australian real estate sector, with its high-value transactions and potential for capital growth, is an established and attractive channel for money laundering. Criminals exploit the market’s stability and the ability to conceal ownership through complex structures, making it a prime target to legitimise the proceeds of crime.
For real estate agents and other professional service providers, understanding these risks is crucial, particularly with significant regulatory changes on the horizon. This guide outlines the common methods criminals use to launder money through real estate. It details the key red flags to watch for, helping professionals prepare for their anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) obligations under the upcoming Tranche 2 reforms.
Direct Money Laundering Methods
Using Third Parties & Nominees
One of the most established money laundering methods involves criminals using third parties to purchase Australian real estate, effectively distancing themselves from the transaction.
These individuals, often referred to as nominees or “straw buyers,” may be family members, friends, or associates who act as the legal owner of the property title. This approach allows the criminal to avoid direct involvement in the money laundering process and complicates efforts by authorities to trace and confiscate the proceeds of crime.
To execute this, a criminal may use several tactics, including:
| Tactic | Description |
|---|---|
| Provide Illicit Funds Directly | The criminal supplies illicit funds to a third party, who then acts as the legitimate buyer throughout the purchase process. |
| Use Third-Party Bank Accounts | Illicit funds are deposited into a nominee’s bank account, which is then used for property purchase funds or to obtain bank cheques. |
| Employ “Cleanskins” | Complicit third parties with no prior criminal record are recruited to make the transaction appear more legitimate and less likely to attract scrutiny. |
This method is designed to conceal the ultimate beneficial ownership of the property. By keeping their name off all official documents, the criminal creates a significant barrier for law enforcement, making it difficult to connect the high-value asset back to the original criminal activity.
Structuring Cash Deposits to Avoid Reporting
Structuring is a deliberate technique used by criminals to place large amounts of illicit cash into the financial system without triggering mandatory reporting obligations. In Australia, financial institutions are required to report any physical currency transactions of AUD 10,000 or more to the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC). To circumvent this, a criminal will break down a large sum of cash into multiple smaller deposits.
This method often involves:
- High volumes of transactions are made across different banks, branches, or on separate days.
- Each deposit kept below the $10,000 threshold.
Once deposited, the illicit funds are aggregated electronically and can then be used to obtain a bank cheque for a property deposit or to make loan repayments. Structuring has been practically applied in money laundering through real estate, as demonstrated by its use to finance a property purchase partially.
Exploiting Loans & Mortgages
Criminals frequently exploit loans and mortgages to serve as a cover for laundering the proceeds of crime, allowing them to integrate illicit funds into high-value assets.
One common approach is to obtain a mortgage, sometimes using falsified income documents, and then use illicit funds to make the repayments. This commingles dirty money with legitimate funds, making the mortgage payments appear clean.
A more sophisticated technique is the “loan-back” scheme, which involves:
- A criminal sending their illicit funds to an offshore company that they secretly control.
- This offshore entity then “lends” the money back to the criminal, who uses it to purchase Australian real estate.
- The criminal repays this seemingly legitimate loan with more illicit funds.
This creates a false paper trail of debt servicing that effectively launders the money.
Get Your Free Initial Consultation
Request a Free Consultation with one of our experienced AML Lawyers today.
Manipulating Property Values & Transactions
Under- & Over-Valuation of Property
A common money laundering method involves the manipulation of property values, where criminals collude with buyers, sellers, or other third parties to misrepresent a property’s price on official documents. This distortion allows illicit funds to be moved or legitimised through the transaction.
The manipulation of property values can take several forms, each designed to serve a specific purpose in the money laundering process:
| Valuation Method | Purpose & Execution |
|---|---|
| Under-valuation | The contract of sale records a price lower than the property’s market value. The buyer pays the difference to the seller secretly with illicit cash. This allows the buyer to claim the transaction is within their legitimate means and to pay less stamp duty. |
| Over-valuation | A property is purchased at an artificially inflated price. The primary goal is to secure the largest possible loan from a financial institution, which can then be serviced using illicit funds. |
Successive Sales & Rapid Flipping
To further complicate the audit trail and create a sense of legitimacy, criminals often engage in the rapid buying and selling of properties, a technique known as “flipping.” This method involves successive sales of the same property in a short period, making it difficult for authorities to trace the source of funds.
The property is typically sold at a higher price with each transaction, creating the appearance of legitimate profits from capital gains. These sales often involve related parties, such as:
- Associates
- Family members
- Shell companies and trusts controlled by the criminal
This strategy ensures that while the ownership appears to change on paper, the criminal maintains ultimate control over the asset, successfully layering the illicit funds and integrating them into the legitimate economy as investment returns.
Money Laundering Using Complex Structures & Professional Services
Concealing Ownership with Shell Companies & Trusts
Criminals frequently use sophisticated legal structures to conceal their connection to a property and launder money. Front companies, shell companies, and trusts, established either in Australia or offshore, are primary tools for this purpose. These entities create a legal barrier that distances the criminal from the asset, making it difficult for authorities to determine the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO).
The use of these structures is a significant money laundering red flag for any real estate agent. Key characteristics of this method include:
| Structure | Description |
|---|---|
| Shell Companies | These are companies with no real business operations, often registered in secrecy jurisdictions, existing solely to hold assets and obscure the true owner’s identity. |
| Trusts | Opaque trust structures are used where beneficiaries are not clearly identified or can be easily changed, making it difficult to trace who ultimately controls the property. |
| Layered Structures | Multiple layers of companies or trusts, often across different countries, are used to create a complex and confusing ownership chain that is hard for investigators to unravel. |
Misusing Rental Income
Properties purchased with the proceeds of crime can be used to generate a seemingly legitimate income stream through rental payments. This method allows criminals to integrate their illicit funds into the financial system by disguising them as legitimate earnings from a property asset.
There are several ways criminals misuse rental income:
| Method | Description |
|---|---|
| Use of an Associate Tenant | A criminal leases out a property and provides the tenant (often an associate) with illicit cash to make the rental payments. |
| Creation of Fictitious Rent | The criminal owner deposits their own illicit funds into a bank account, labelling the deposits as “fictitious” rent to create a clean paper trail. |
| Self-Rental via Nominee | A property is purchased in a nominee’s name, and the criminal then pays that nominee “rent” using illicit funds, effectively disguising ownership and the money’s source. |
A key red flag for a real estate agent is when a tenant offers to pay rent months in advance, particularly if the payment is made in cash.
Laundering via Renovations & Improvements
Investing illicit funds into property renovations is another established method for laundering money. Criminals can purchase a property, often one that is undervalued or in need of repair, and then use undeclared cash to pay for significant upgrades and improvements. This process serves to both layer and integrate the illicit funds.
This technique increases the property’s market value. When the renovated property is sold at a higher price, the profit generated from the sale is treated as a legitimate capital gain. This effectively washes the initial cash investment used for the renovations, making the proceeds appear clean.
In some cases, contractors and tradespeople may be paid in cash, which they might not declare for tax purposes, adding another layer of illegality.
Exploiting Professional Facilitators & Gatekeepers
The process of buying real estate typically involves various professionals who can be exploited, either wittingly or unwittingly, to facilitate money laundering. These “gatekeepers,” such as lawyers, accountants, conveyancers, and real estate agents, can provide a veneer of legitimacy to criminal transactions.
These professional service providers may assist criminals in several ways, including:
- Establishing and managing complex domestic or offshore structures like companies or trusts.
- Conducting financial transactions on behalf of the criminal to create distance.
- Receiving and transferring large sums of cash through their trust accounts.
- Arranging complex loans and other credit facilities.
- Introducing criminals to financial institutions can lend an air of credibility.
- Facilitating the transfer of property ownership to nominees or other third parties.
By using multiple professionals, criminals can further complicate the money laundering process, making it much harder for authorities to detect and trace the illicit funds.
Get Your Free Initial Consultation
Request a Free Consultation with one of our experienced AML Lawyers today.
Case Studies in Australian Real Estate
The Xue Syndicate Mortgage Laundering Scheme
A prominent real-life example of money laundering through real estate involved Xiaoli Xue and a sophisticated operation in Sydney connected to the illicit tobacco trade. This case highlights how criminals exploit legitimate financial products, such as mortgages, to launder the proceeds of crime.
The key aspects of this scheme included:
| Aspect of the Scheme | Details |
|---|---|
| Fraudulent Mortgages | Since 2020, the syndicate allegedly secured multiple home loans (reportedly as many as ten) by using falsified income documents to access the financial system. |
| Repayment with Illicit Funds | Nearly $7 million, sourced primarily from Sydney’s illegal tobacco trade, was used to repay these mortgages, integrating criminal proceeds into the economy as clean repayments. |
| Asset Seizures | Investigations led to the seizure of millions in illicit tobacco, cash, and luxury vehicles, connecting property transactions to broader criminal activity. |
Get Your Free Initial Consultation
Request a Free Consultation with one of our experienced AML Lawyers today.
Conclusion
The Australian real estate sector’s high value and complexity make it a prime target for money laundering, utilising methods like third-party involvement, manipulated property values, and complex ownership structures, which present distinct red flags for a real estate agent. Upcoming Tranche 2 reforms under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) necessitate vigilance and robust anti-money laundering compliance from real estate professionals to mitigate these significant financial crime risks.
Navigating the complexities of these upcoming anti-money laundering obligations requires careful preparation and expert guidance. Contact AML House today to leverage our real estate AML/CTF compliance expertise and ensure your real estate agency is fully prepared for the Tranche 2 reforms, safeguarding your business and mitigating reputational damage.
