Introduction
The Australian real estate industry is facing a significant transformation as global developments, including expanding international sanctions and increased scrutiny from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), heighten the risk of money laundering and terrorism financing. As criminals increasingly target property transactions to move illicit funds, the sector has become a key focus in the fight against financial crime.
In response, Australia is implementing significant anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) reform, introducing new compliance obligations for real estate agencies. This guide provides practical information for Australian real estate agencies to understand these changes, detailing how global risks are reshaping their responsibilities and how to adjust internal controls to meet the new requirements for due diligence and reporting to the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC).
Global AML Landscape & Risks for Australian Real Estate
The Impact of Expanding International Sanctions
Geopolitical instability has led to an intricate and ever-expanding web of international sanctions, which are no longer a niche concern for banks but a direct threat to the real estate sector. These measures, governed in Australia by laws like the Autonomous Sanctions Act 2011 (Cth), target foreign regimes, terrorists, and other malicious actors by freezing their assets.
This presents a significant risk for a real estate agent: a client who seems legitimate one day could be on a prohibited list the next, making it a criminal offence to proceed with a transaction that benefits them. The impact on property transactions is substantial, as facilitating a deal with a sanctioned party, even unwittingly, can lead to severe penalties, including:
- Multi-million dollar fines
- Imprisonment
Real estate professionals are expected to screen all parties against the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) Consolidated List, a public database of all individuals and entities subject to Australian sanctions. The core prohibitions are strict:
- It is illegal to directly or indirectly make an asset, such as a property, available to a designated person or entity.
- Using or dealing with a “controlled asset” is illegal, any asset owned or controlled by a sanctioned party. Such assets must be immediately frozen.
Enforcement is active, as demonstrated by the Australian Federal Police (AFP) restraining $15.6 million in assets in 2024, including seven properties linked to Russian nationals alleged to have laundered funds into Australia. This highlights that ignorance is not a defence, and robust due diligence is essential for every real estate agent to avoid facilitating financial crime.
FATF Scrutiny & The Grey List Threat
The FATF is the global standard-setter for AML/CTF, and its scrutiny presents a significant risk to the Australian economy. For years, the FATF has criticised Australia for failing to regulate “gatekeeper” professions, including real estate agents, lawyers, and accountants.
This regulatory gap has made Australia an international outlier, leaving the property market vulnerable as a channel for illicit funds. This long-standing deficiency places Australia at a very real risk of being placed on the FATF “grey list” following its subsequent mutual evaluation in late 2026.
Grey-listing signals to the world that a country has strategic weaknesses in its AML/CTF regime and carries severe consequences, including:
| Consequences of “Grey-Listing” | Description |
|---|---|
| Reduced Capital Inflows | A significant reduction in capital inflows and foreign investment, with IMF estimates suggesting a potential impact of up to 7.6% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). |
| Increased Business Costs | Increased costs and friction for all international business, as foreign banks apply enhanced due diligence to Australian transactions. |
| Reputational Damage | Serious reputational damage to Australia’s standing in the global financial system. |
Furthermore, when the FATF places other nations on its grey list, it can create a domino effect. Illicit actors in those scrutinised jurisdictions often seek to move their funds to safer, less-regulated havens, making Australia’s property market an even more attractive target for money laundering.
Global Push for Transparency & Economic Crime Laws
Australia’s impending Tranche 2 reforms are not occurring in isolation, but are part of a broader global movement to combat economic crime and increase financial transparency. Around the world, governments are tightening laws and closing loopholes that criminals exploit, creating a new international benchmark Australia must meet.
This push directly responds to the enduring problem of opaque ownership structures. Criminals frequently use anonymous shell companies, trusts, and other complex legal entities, often registered in offshore secrecy jurisdictions, to hide their identities when purchasing property. This vulnerability is a key reason AUSTRAC has identified the real estate sector as having a “very high” vulnerability to money laundering. The issue is so widespread that Transparency International’s Organised Crime and Real Estate Ownership (OREO) Index ranks Australia poorly on real estate transparency.
The evolution of money laundering tactics also drives this global trend. Organised crime syndicates are increasingly using sophisticated methods and new technologies to launder the proceeds of crime through property transactions. These include:
- The growing use of cryptocurrency to fund purchases, which can bypass traditional financial monitoring
- Complex layering techniques involving multiple jurisdictions
- Exploitation of legal loopholes in property ownership structures
As other jurisdictions like the United Kingdom pass new economic crime laws to unmask beneficial owners, the pressure on the Australian real estate industry to adapt has become a national economic and security priority.
Get Your Free Initial Consultation
Request a Free Consultation with one of our experienced AML Lawyers today.
Australia’s Response: The Impending Tranche 2 AML Reform
Impact of Tranche 2 on the Real Estate Industry
Australia has been an international outlier for years for not regulating professions like real estate agents under its AML/CTF laws. In response to sustained pressure from the FATF and the significant risk of being “grey-listed,” the Australian government is implementing the “Tranche 2” reforms.
These changes represent a generation’s most significant regulatory overhaul for the property sector. Effective 1 July 2026, real estate agents, buyers’ agents, and property developers will be brought under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth).
This legislation designates their services as regulated “designated services,” transforming them into reporting entities with direct compliance obligations to the AUSTRAC. This reform moves the real estate industry to the frontline of Australia’s defence against financial crime, making agents key gatekeepers in preventing illicit funds from entering the property market.
Key AML/CTF Obligations for Real Estate Agencies
Under the new regime, real estate agencies must adhere to a comprehensive suite of compliance obligations. These new duties require a fundamental shift in operational processes and a heightened sense of diligence in every transaction.
Key responsibilities for service providers in the real estate sector will include:
| Obligation | Description |
|---|---|
| Enrol with AUSTRAC | Every real estate agency covered by the rules must formally enrol with AUSTRAC before the commencement date. |
| Appoint a Compliance Officer | Designate a specific AML/CTF Compliance Officer responsible for program oversight and to act as the primary contact with AUSTRAC. |
| Develop an AML/CTF Program | Create, implement, and maintain a formal, written AML/CTF program tailored to the agency’s specific money laundering and terrorism financing risks. |
| Conduct Customer Due Diligence (CDD) | Identify and verify the identity of all clients, including the ultimate beneficial owner, especially when dealing with complex corporate structures or trusts. |
| Report to AUSTRAC | File Suspicious Matter Reports (SMRs) for suspected criminal links and Threshold Transaction Reports (TTRs) for dealings involving physical cash or virtual assets of AUD 10,000 or more. |
| Ongoing Monitoring | Conduct ongoing monitoring of customer transactions to identify unusual or suspicious activity that deviates from a client’s typical profile. |
| Record-Keeping | Securely maintain all CDD, transactions, and the AML/CTF program records for at least seven years. |
| Staff Training and Review | Provide regular training to relevant employees and ensure the AML/CTF program undergoes periodic independent review to maintain its effectiveness. |
Adjusting Internal Controls: A Practical Guide for Real Estate Agencies
Strengthening Customer Due Diligence & KYC Processes
Basic identity verification is no longer sufficient for real estate agencies navigating the new AML/CTF landscape. Your CDD and Know Your Customer (KYC) processes must be enhanced to be thorough and risk-based. This involves moving beyond sighting a driver’s licence to adopting a more investigative approach.
A critical component of strengthened due diligence is identifying the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO). If your client is a company or trust, you must take reasonable steps to uncover the individual who ultimately owns or controls the entity, as criminals often use complex corporate structures to hide their identities.
To achieve this, you should:
- Request and review documents like trust deeds and company extracts
- Utilise reliable electronic verification tools, especially for non-resident clients or complex entities
- Be wary of layers of shell corporations or nominee arrangements designed to obscure ownership
Furthermore, it is now crucial to understand and verify your client’s source of funds and wealth. You must ask direct questions about where the money for the deposit and settlement is coming from.
For higher-risk clients, such as Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) or those from high-risk jurisdictions, you must apply enhanced due diligence, which involves taking extra steps to corroborate their financial background.
Integrating Sanctions Screening & Transaction Monitoring
To meet your compliance obligations, sanctions screening must become a standard and integrated part of your client onboarding process. This is not merely a part of KYC but a standalone legal duty.
Your agency must check all parties to a transaction against the consolidated list maintained by the DFAT, which details all individuals and entities subject to Australian sanctions. It is essential to search for every transaction and keep a time-stamped record of the result to show that you have taken reasonable precautions.
Alongside screening, you will need to implement ongoing transaction monitoring to detect unusual or suspicious activity. This requires having systems in place to identify red flags that deviate from normal commercial practice.
Your monitoring processes should be capable of flagging:
- The use of large amounts of physical cash, particularly if structured in deposits under the A$10,000 threshold
- Funds originating from multiple, unrelated third parties or high-risk jurisdictions
- Rapid “flipping” of a property with no genuine improvements or clear economic rationale
- Last-minute, complex changes to ownership or funding structures without a reasonable explanation
Developing a Risk-Based AML & CTF Program
The cornerstone of your compliance framework is a formal, written AML/CTF Program. This document must be tailored to your agency’s specific operations and approved by senior management. It cannot be a generic template; it must be built upon a formal, enterprise-wide risk assessment.
Your risk assessment is the foundational analysis of the specific money laundering and terrorism financing risks your agency faces. It must evaluate several key factors, including:
| Risk Factor | Description |
|---|---|
| Customer Risk | The types of clients you serve, such as non-residents, PEPs, or those using complex trusts or offshore companies. |
| Geographic Risk | The jurisdictions your clients are from or where funds originate, particularly those known for high levels of corruption or weak AML laws. |
| Product/Service Risk | The susceptibility of your services, like facilitating high-value property sales, to being misused for financial crime. |
| Channel Risk | The methods you use to conduct business, such as non-face-to-face interactions, can make identity verification more challenging. |
Based on this assessment, your AML/CTF program will detail the policies, procedures, and internal controls for managing these risks, covering everything from CDD and transaction monitoring to reporting, record-keeping, and staff training. Each real estate agency must also appoint a designated AML/CTF Compliance Officer to oversee the program and be the key point of contact with AUSTRAC.
Get Your Free Initial Consultation
Request a Free Consultation with one of our experienced AML Lawyers today.
Recognising AML & CTF Red Flags
Client Behaviour & Transactional Red Flags
Under the new AML/CTF framework, your staff must be trained to act as human sensors, capable of detecting anomalies that signal potential financial crime. Recognising these red flags is critical to your compliance obligations and the first line of defence in protecting your real estate agency from exploitation.
These indicators can be related to a client’s behaviour, the transaction structure, or the source of funds.
| Red Flag Category | Examples of Indicators |
|---|---|
| Client Behaviour | Reluctance to provide identification or information on the source of funds. Use of intermediaries obscuring the actual buyer’s identity. Unusual indifference to property value, condition, or fees. Client’s known financial background is inconsistent with the property value. Preference for avoiding face-to-face meetings without a reasonable explanation. |
| Transaction & Funding | Use large amounts of physical cash, primarily if structured below the $10,000 threshold. Funds originating from multiple, unrelated third parties or high-risk jurisdictions. Last-minute, complex changes to ownership or funding without a logical explanation. Requests to have overpayments or refunds sent to an unrelated third party. Funds provided by a third party are introduced late in the transaction. |
Laundering Techniques Specific to the Real Estate Sector
Criminals and their networks employ sophisticated methods specifically designed to exploit the mechanics of property transactions to launder illicit funds. AUSTRAC has identified the real estate sector as having a “very high” vulnerability to money laundering because these techniques can effectively disguise the proceeds of crime, making them appear legitimate assets.
Understanding these typologies is essential for any real estate agent to fulfil compliance obligations.
Common laundering techniques specific to the real estate industry include:
| Laundering Technique | Description |
|---|---|
| Use of Third Parties | Employing “cleanskins” (associates or family members with no criminal record) to act as the legal purchaser, distancing the criminal from the illicit funds. |
| Complex Corporate Structures | Using layers of shell companies and trusts, often in offshore secrecy jurisdictions, to obscure the identity of the UBO. |
| Manipulation of Property Values | Understating a property’s value to pay the difference “off the books” with illicit cash, or overvaluing it to secure a larger, seemingly legitimate loan. |
| Rapid Property “Flipping” | Buying and quickly reselling a property, often at an inflated price with no genuine improvements, to make illicit funds appear as legitimate investment profit. |
| Fictitious Rental Income | Using illicit funds to make “rental payments” to oneself after purchasing a property, creating a false paper trail of legitimate income. |
| Loan-Back Schemes | Using illicit funds held offshore as collateral to obtain a “clean” loan from an Australian institution, which is then used to purchase property. |
Operational & Financial Impacts for the Real Estate Industry
Compliance Costs & Resource Allocation
The introduction of AML/CTF obligations will have a significant financial impact on the real estate industry. Industry estimates suggest that the sector could face annual compliance costs of approximately $2 billion, a substantial new operational expense for agencies of all sizes.
For smaller real estate agencies, the initial setup costs for a basic compliance framework are estimated to be between $4,000 and $5,000, plus Goods and Services Tax (GST). Beyond this initial investment, agencies must also budget for significant ongoing expenses, which include:
| Expense Category | Description |
|---|---|
| Advisory and Auditing Fees | Engaging external experts for advice and periodic independent AML/CTF program reviews. |
| Technology Investment | Purchasing and maintaining specialised software for customer verification, sanctions screening, and transaction monitoring. |
| Staff Training | Allocating resources for regular and role-specific training to ensure all personnel understand their compliance duties. |
| Compliance Personnel | Appointing a dedicated AML/CTF Compliance Officer may require hiring new staff or reallocating senior personnel. |
Navigating Operational Complexity & Client Experience
Beyond the direct financial costs, the Tranche 2 reforms will introduce considerable operational complexity into the day-to-day running of a real estate business. Agencies must balance meeting stringent regulatory requirements and maintaining a smooth and positive client experience, which can be challenging.
The Property Council of Australia has highlighted several key operational hurdles that the real estate industry will need to overcome:
| Operational Hurdle | Description |
|---|---|
| Duplication of Processes | The potential for duplicating due diligence efforts already undertaken by other regulated entities in a transaction, such as conveyancers or banks. |
| Delayed Due Diligence | Managing the timing of CDD, particularly for buyers who may be identified late in the sale process. |
| Reliance Frameworks | Implementing effective reliance frameworks, where an agency might depend on the due diligence performed by another party like a conveyancer. |
| Coordinating Compliance | Ensuring compliance is coordinated effectively when multiple parties are involved in a single property transaction. |
Moreover, these new processes will inevitably affect client onboarding timelines, as agents must request and verify additional documentation. Clear communication will be essential to manage client expectations regarding these legal requirements and avoid surprises that could disrupt or delay property transactions.
Leveraging Technology for AML & CTF Compliance
Digital Identity Verification & Screening Tools
Meeting the new AML/CTF obligations efficiently will be impossible for many real estate agencies without technological assistance. Manual compliance processes are often not viable long-term, making technology a critical ally for any real estate agent looking to streamline their compliance.
Adopting digital identity verification tools can make the client onboarding process faster and more secure. These solutions can:
- Verify government-issued IDs
- Perform biometric checks, which are particularly useful when dealing with non-resident clients or complex corporate structures
Furthermore, technology helps agencies avoid evolving threats, including deepfakes, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated identity fraud, and manipulated documents for verification.
A key part of the compliance framework is automated screening software. These tools can perform real-time checks of clients against various watchlists, including:
- Global sanctions lists, such as the one maintained by the DFAT
- Databases of PEPs
- Adverse media reports that may indicate a higher risk profile
Many agencies turn to integrated AML platforms that bundle these screening services with KYC workflows, creating a more efficient and auditable compliance process.
Implementing Automated Transaction Monitoring Systems
Beyond initial onboarding, real estate agencies must continuously monitor customer transactions to detect unusual or suspicious activity. For larger firms, AI-powered systems can analyse transaction data to identify patterns and red flags that might be missed by the human eye, strengthening the agency’s defence against financial crime.
Automated transaction monitoring systems can be set up to flag specific high-risk indicators that require further investigation. These systems can provide alerts for activities such as:
- The use of large amounts of physical cash, primarily if structured in multiple deposits under the A$10,000 threshold
- Funds originating from numerous, unrelated third-party sources or high-risk jurisdictions
- The rapid “flipping” of a property, where it is bought and quickly resold at an inflated price with no genuine improvements
- Last-minute, complex changes to ownership or funding structures without a reasonable commercial explanation
As criminals increasingly use cryptocurrency to fund property purchases, these monitoring systems can also incorporate blockchain analytics to help trace the origin of digital assets. This ensures that all payments, regardless of form, align with regulatory requirements and do not expose the real estate industry to illicit funds.
Get Your Free Initial Consultation
Request a Free Consultation with one of our experienced AML Lawyers today.
Conclusion
The Australian real estate sector is facing a significant transformation due to global pressures like international sanctions and FATF scrutiny, prompting major AML/CTF reform. From 1 July 2026, real estate agencies must adopt comprehensive compliance obligations, including robust due diligence, transaction monitoring, and reporting to AUSTRAC, to mitigate financial crime risk.
Navigating this new regulatory landscape requires trusted AML expertise for real estate to ensure your agency is compliant and resilient. Contact our experts at AML House today for expert support for your agency’s AML compliance.
